Mapping Educational Service Quality Research: A Bibliometric and Science Mapping Analysis of Research Trends and Thematic Evolution (2011–2026)

Authors

  • Resky Nuralisa Gunawan Yogyakarta State University
  • Dwi Mahardiyati Arizona State University
  • Lamanisa Rasid Saputra University of Washington
  • Indah Sari Hamid Texas A&M University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59247/ijase.v3i1.153

Keywords:

Educational Service Quality, Bibliometric Analysis, Science Mapping, Student Satisfaction, SERVQUAL, Higher Education

Abstract

This study aims to analyze publication trends, thematic structures, collaboration patterns, and emerging research directions in educational service quality studies indexed in the Scopus database between 2011 and 2026. A total of 70 journal articles were selected through a PRISMA-based screening process from an initial dataset of 193 documents. The analysis employed bibliometric and science mapping techniques, including publication trend analysis, co-authorship analysis, bibliographic coupling, and keyword co-occurrence analysis. Bibliometrix (R-package) was used for descriptive bibliometric analysis, while VOSviewer was utilized to visualize thematic relationships and research networks. The findings indicate a significant increase in publication output after 2019, reflecting growing academic interest in educational service quality evaluation. Research in this field is predominantly concentrated within social sciences and management disciplines, with SERVQUAL, student satisfaction, higher education, and service quality emerging as the most dominant themes. The keyword evolution analysis demonstrates a transition from descriptive and perception-based evaluation approaches toward more outcome-oriented research focusing on institutional performance and student experience. The collaboration analysis reveals relatively fragmented research networks among authors and institutions, indicating opportunities for stronger interdisciplinary and international collaboration. The existing literature remains heavily dependent on traditional survey-based methodologies, while advanced analytical approaches such as learning analytics, machine learning, predictive modelling, and intelligent decision support systems remain underexplored within educational service quality research. This study contributes to the literature by providing a comprehensive bibliometric overview of the intellectual structure and thematic evolution of educational service quality research. The findings offer insights for researchers, educational institutions, and policymakers in developing more data-driven, interdisciplinary, and technology-oriented approaches for evaluating and improving educational service quality.

References

M. Ul Hassan, A. Murtaza, and K. Rashid, “Redefining Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in the Era of Globalisation and Global Crises: A Proposal for Future Sustainability,” Eur. J. Educ., vol. 60, no. 1, p. e12822, Mar. 2025, https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12822.

T. U. Rehman, “The transformative impact and evolving landscape: A comprehensive exploration of the globalization of higher education in the 21st century,” J. Furth. High. Educ., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 346–361, Mar. 2025, https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2025.2457537.

E. Ahmed, A. Shaukat, and E. AlDhaen, “A Review of the Recent Developments in the Higher Education Sector Globally and in the GCC Region,” Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol. 487, pp. 635–651, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35828-9_54.

E. A. Mtitu, “Exploring factors for the introduction and implementation of quality assurance systems in selected higher education institutions in Tanzania,” Cogent Education, vol. 12, no. 1, Dec. 2025, https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2455767.

A. Balan, “Neoliberalism, privatisation and marketisation: The implications for legal education in England and Wales,” Cogent Education, vol. 10, no. 2, Dec. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2284548.

H. Amin and L. Cochrane, “The development of the education system in Qatar: assessing the intended and unintended impacts of privatization policy shifts,” British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1091–1111, Oct. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1080/13530194.2023.2198688.

S. Liu and I. Hardy, “Understanding Chinese national vocational education reform: a critical policy analysis,” Journal of Vocational Education & Training, vol. 75, no. 5, pp. 1055–1077, Oct. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2021.1998195.

A. Mahboubi et al., “The evolving threat landscape of botnets: Comprehensive analysis of detection techniques in the age of artificial intelligence,” Internet of Things, vol. 33, p. 101728, Sep. 2025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2025.101728.

H. Masjedy and S. M. R. Adel, “Fuzzy logic theory: A unifying pathway to intelligent accountability in addressing methodological challenges of applied linguistics,” Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, vol. 4, no. 3, p. 100278, Dec. 2025, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2025.100278.

S. Tripathi, N. Bachmann, M. Brunner, Z. Rizk, and H. Jodlbauer, “Assessing the current landscape of AI and sustainability literature: identifying key trends, addressing gaps and challenges,” Journal of Big Data 2024 11:1, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 65-, May 2024, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-024-00912-x.

M. D. Xames and T. G. Topcu, “A Systematic Literature Review of Digital Twin Research for Healthcare Systems: Research Trends, Gaps, and Realization Challenges,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 4099–4126, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3349379.

A. Karamanli, A. Xanthopoulos, A. Gasteratos, and D. Koulouriotis, “A Bibliometric and Systematic Review of Manufacturing-as-a-Service: Literature Insights, Challenges, and Future Trends,” Applied Sciences 2025, Vol. 15, Page 2440, vol. 15, no. 5, p. 2440, Feb. 2025, https://doi.org/10.3390/app15052440.

S. E. Bibri, “Data-driven smart eco-cities and sustainable integrated districts: A best-evidence synthesis approach to an extensive literature review,” European Journal of Futures Research, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 16, Nov. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40309-021-00181-4.

L. Yan and W. Zhiping, “Mapping the Literature on Academic Publishing: A Bibliometric Analysis on WOS,” Sage Open, vol. 13, no. 1, Jan. 2023, https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231158562.

P. K. Maghelal and W. Ullah, “Advanced data analytics in disaster management: A bibliometric analysis of global research trends, methods, and collaboration networks (2006–2025),” Progress in Disaster Science, vol. 30, p. 100555, Apr. 2026, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2026.100555.

A. Rejeb, K. Rejeb, and H. Treiblmaier, “Mapping Metaverse Research: Identifying Future Research Areas Based on Bibliometric and Topic Modeling Techniques,” Information 2023, Vol. 14, Page 356, vol. 14, no. 7, p. 356, Jun. 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/info14070356.

M. Tani, V. Muto, G. Basile, and G. Nevi, “A Bibliometric Analysis to Study the Evolution of Artificial Intelligence in Business Ethics,” Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 655–677, Apr. 2025, https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12797.

W. M. Lim and S. Kumar, “Guidelines for interpreting the results of bibliometric analysis: A sensemaking approach,” Global Business and Organizational Excellence, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 17–26, Jan. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.22229.

R. Islam, G. Yildirim, A. Rahman, and M. S. Kamal, “Artificial intelligence in cybersecurity and education: A bibliometric review of emerging trends and research frontiers,” Sustainable Futures, vol. 11, p. 101807, Jun. 2026, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2026.101807.

P. Basnet and L. Li, “Enhancing product and service development through AI-integrated Quality Function Deployment,” Research in Engineering Design, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 4-, Nov. 2025, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-025-00467-9.

G. García-Vidal, A. Sánchez-Rodríguez, L. Guzmán-Vilar, R. Pérez-Campdesuñer, and R. Martínez-Vivar, “Entropy-Based Assessment of AI Adoption Patterns in Micro and Small Enterprises: Insights into Strategic Decision-Making and Ecosystem Development in Emerging Economies,” Information, vol. 16, no. 9, p. 770, Sep. 2025, https://doi.org/10.3390/info16090770.

A. Gaur, E. L. Peng, C. Pattnaik, and Y. Li, “Advancing international business research through artificial intelligence and machine learning applications,” Journal of World Business, vol. 61, no. 3, p. 101725, Apr. 2026, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2026.101725.

K. Alzouebi, D. Y. Al Hammadi, A. Ankit, and O. Abu Khurma, “School Innovation: Building a Culture Through Leadership and Stakeholder Engagement,” Societies 2025, Vol. 15, Page 77, vol. 15, no. 4, p. 77, Mar. 2025, https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15040077.

I. Storonyanska, L. Benovska, K. Patytska, O. Ivashko, and I. Chulipa, “Redesigning Sustainable Vocational Education Systems to Respond to Global Economic Trends and Labor Market Demands: Evidence from EU Countries on SDGs,” Sustainability 2025, Vol. 17, Page 9530, vol. 17, no. 21, p. 9530, Oct. 2025, https://doi.org/10.3390/su17219530.

P. A. Khan, S. K. Johl, S. Akhtar, M. Asif, A. A. Salameh, and T. Kanesan, “Open Innovation of Institutional Investors and Higher Education System in Creating Open Approach for SDG-4 Quality Education: A Conceptual Review,” Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 49, Mar. 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8010049.

S. Gupta, S. Modgil, S. Bhattacharyya, and I. Bose, “Artificial intelligence for decision support systems in the field of operations research: review and future scope of research,” Annals of Operations Research 2021 308:1, vol. 308, no. 1, pp. 215–274, Jan. 2021, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-020-03856-6.

A. P. de A. Costa et al., “Integrating multicriteria decision making and principal component analysis: a systematic literature review,” Cogent Eng., vol. 11, no. 1, Dec. 2024, https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2024.2374944.

R. P. Bartolo and H. Tınmaz, “Service quality in higher education: A literature review,” J. Educ. Gift. Young Sci., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 119–135, Sep. 2024, https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.1518891.

Y. Liu, T. Bao, D. Zhao, H. Sang, and B. Fu, “Evaluation of Student-Perceived Service Quality in Higher Education for Sustainable Development: A Fuzzy TODIM-ERA Method,” Sustainability, vol. 14, no. 8, p. 4761, Jan. 2022, https://doi.org/10.3390/su14084761.

E. Taraza, S. Anastasiadou, A. Masouras, and C. Papademetriou, “Sustainable Development and Implementation of Quality Management Excellence Models in Public Organizations: A Systematic Literature Review,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 10, p. 7971, Jan. 2023, https://doi.org/10.3390/su15107971.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-26

How to Cite

Gunawan, R. N., Mahardiyati, D., Saputra, L. R., & Hamid, I. S. (2026). Mapping Educational Service Quality Research: A Bibliometric and Science Mapping Analysis of Research Trends and Thematic Evolution (2011–2026). Indonesian Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.59247/ijase.v3i1.153

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)